Should any designer of an operating system for a smartphone or tablet that is manufactured, leased or sold in the United States be legally required to ensure that data on such devices is accessible pursuant to a search warrant?
March 13, 2023
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
Transparency vs Privacy in the US The Current State of Transparency vs Privacy in the US Most Americans* are concerned about their personal ...
-
Introduction A national DNA database would collect data from millions of citizens across the country and store each individual’s genetic s...
-
(Audible, N.D) Who is Edward Snowden and What did he do? Edward Snowden started working for the Central Intelligence Agency in 2006, where...
I would say yes, they should be required to ensure the information is obtainable with a search warrant. Digital information should be not immune to being searched simply do to its format. As long as there is a search warrant involved, it should be accessible to law enforcement and government officials. So a law ensuring that it accessible, as long as there is a search warrant, should be required.
ReplyDeleteI'm not sure. After reading about the considerable privacy and human rights concerns, I'd air against allowing data to be easily accessible to the government. If, however, tech companies were able to manage encryption and privacy concerns effectively and the US government could only access online data with a search warrant, I'd support that.
ReplyDeleteNo. I believe that companies fully have the right to allow backdoors for government use, I do not believe they should be required to install them. This would put a hard cap on the privacy a person can expect from an app, if there were no legal ways to communicate without the possibility of full encryption then that would be the furthest extent of privacy allowed to a person online. Furthermore, a company choosing to not add a backdoor would give more protections to consumers against hackers and leakers, such as the example about the Catholic priest who was caught using location data acquired from Grindr. If the company chooses not to add anyway for any one else to access that information, the priest would still have his livelihood.
ReplyDeleteNo, because no security system is unbreakable, and any information made available with a warrant will also be available without one, whether to hackers or other malicious actors, or a government overstepping its bounds. If a system is designed such that information is accessible without the owners consent, then the system can be comprised and the data stolen. There is no way to program in a backdoor only accessible by the government with a warrant, a backdoor is a backdoor is a backdoor, and I believe that the security risks for the user are greater than the need by the government to have access.
ReplyDeleteThis is a tough question, but I think I'll say no. Implementing a backdoor would increase security risks, and it could easily be exploited by hackers. Plus, after reading about Snowden, I'm not sure how much I'd trust authorities that they'll try to use the backdoor only with a warrant. On the other hand, I do think that, ideally, law enforcement should be able to get information from phones with warrants. Overall, I think I just need more information on how law enforcement get info from phones today and if there are ways in which they can get this info while keeping security strong.
ReplyDeleteI think Jake makes a good point, and I agree that with having the possibility of access in the first place, it would be more easily manipulated by non-government entities as well. I'm not sure how much data is already being assessed without informed consent, but I wouldn't be surprised if there's a lot out there being used or sold. If they already do have that kind of open accessibility to our data, I would say yes, there should be a search warrant law in place for governmental use for safety and prevention.
ReplyDeleteIs that a "yes" or a "no"? The issue isn't whether there is or is not a search warrant. The issue is whether the phone manufacturer, after being presented with a search warrant, should be able to access the phone and retrieve the information even if it is locked and otherwise inaccessible.
DeleteAs an advocate for heightened privacy measures, I do believe that a search warrant should be necessary for governmental use. In large part however, I believe that due to the myriad number of ways we are tracked, with or without our consent, the information gathered on our phones pertaining to a warrant would be specific to a crime. Whereas we are tracked normally on our phones, companies do not look for anything in particular to incriminate us. For governments however, a warrant would be issued by a judge in the case that there is a prospective crime being committed. To this end, I do think it will do more good than bad.
ReplyDeleteThis is a tough question because on one hand we can see suspicious activity along with other information. On the other hand people who can hack the system could use a backdoor to get information on people on a mass scale and use the information for misdeeds. I feel I will go with no. Where adding a backdoor could help stop malicious activities the downsides are far too risky even with high security measures because eventually it will be broken. Even if broken for a small amount of time that information could be extremely harmful depending on what they get.
ReplyDeleteI would say yes. I do think that law enforcement should be able to access data stored by apps, but that they should have to obtain a warrant to do so. I think that in general apps should have more transparency about what data they are storing so that a person can decide whether they want to consent to this data being collected, and potentially seen by outside entities such as law enforcement. I also think that all data should be encrypted, and that there should be regulations on who can access the data within the company that is collecting/storing it, but it doesn't have to be end-to-end encryption.
ReplyDeleteYes. I agree with what Lindsay said about how digital information is no different from physical information, so the government should be allowed to access it after going through the proper channels. I don’t think it would be a “back door”, but rather a situation where they show a key to the front door and access it after showing the warrant and get information that way, such as sending a request to the company with the warrant and what they need and the company can get them access to that data and that data alone.
ReplyDeleteNo. Eequiring "backdoors" in an operating system for the government or the authors of the software to access creates huge problems for the security, safety, and privacy of everyone, not just those who are expected of doing wrong.
ReplyDeleteI do think so. If a search warrant is issued for proper cause, then I believe that whatever information is granted should be collected and reviewed (if warrant request specific pieces or evidence from a suspect's phone). This argument ties back to a broader security vs privacy argument, in which I follow that security is far more valuable than individuality (which opens its whole cans of worms I know).
ReplyDelete